Difference between revisions of "Talk:Finding Entities (AMX Mod X)"
(find_ent_by_owner notes is incorrect) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Also grenade example isn't good enough because (as i said before) it's necessary to specify classname i.e "grenade", but planted C4 also have this classname in CS. | Also grenade example isn't good enough because (as i said before) it's necessary to specify classname i.e "grenade", but planted C4 also have this classname in CS. | ||
So in some cases function result could be an C4 entity id. | So in some cases function result could be an C4 entity id. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Please fix this then. I've never used it before so I wouldn't know. Also notice the tag that I have on it that says I can't verify it? -- [[User:Hawk552|Hawk552]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Yes, i noticed that tag. I just thought it would be better if author would fix it using my notes. --[[User:VEN|VEN]] 08:49, 26 January 2006 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:49, 26 January 2006
"This function also checks for classname, unless directed not to."
find_ent_by_owner always require an actual classname to be specified i believe. Though in some cases it would be usefull if it would be possible to skip this requirement somehow.
Also grenade example isn't good enough because (as i said before) it's necessary to specify classname i.e "grenade", but planted C4 also have this classname in CS. So in some cases function result could be an C4 entity id.
- Please fix this then. I've never used it before so I wouldn't know. Also notice the tag that I have on it that says I can't verify it? -- Hawk552
- Yes, i noticed that tag. I just thought it would be better if author would fix it using my notes. --VEN 08:49, 26 January 2006 (EST)
